LDAUTYPE
LDAUTYPE = 1 | 2 | 4
Default: LDAUTYPE = 2
Description: LDAUTYPE specifies which type of DFT+U approach will be used.
The semilocal LDA and GGA functionals often fail to describe systems with localized (strongly correlated) d and f-electrons (this manifests itself primarily in the form of unrealistic one-electron energies). In some cases this can be remedied by introducing a strong intra-atomic interaction in a (screened) Hartree-Fock like manner, as an on-site replacement of the semilocal functional. This approach is commonly known as the DFT+U method. Setting LDAU=.TRUE. in the INCAR file switches on the DFT+U. The first VASP DFT+U calculations, including some additional technical details on the VASP implementation, can be found in Ref. [1] (the original implementation was done by Olivie Bengone [2] and Georg Kresse).
- This particular flavour of DFT+U is of the form
- [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm HF}=\frac{1}{2} \sum_{\{\gamma\}} (U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_2\gamma_4} - U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_4\gamma_2}){ \hat n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2}{\hat n}_{\gamma_3\gamma_4} }[/math]
- and is determined by the PAW on-site occupancies
- [math]\displaystyle{ {\hat n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2} = \langle \Psi^{s_2} \mid m_2 \rangle \langle m_1 \mid \Psi^{s_1} \rangle }[/math]
- and the (unscreened) on-site electron-electron interaction
- [math]\displaystyle{ U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_2\gamma_4}= \langle m_1 m_3 \mid \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}^\prime|} \mid m_2 m_4 \rangle \delta_{s_1 s_2} \delta_{s_3 s_4} }[/math]
- where |m⟩ are real spherical harmonics of angular momentum L=LDAUL.
- The unscreened e-e interaction Uγ1γ3γ2γ4 can be written in terms of the Slater integrals [math]\displaystyle{ F^0 }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ F^2 }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ F^4 }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ F^6 }[/math] (f-electrons). Using values for the Slater integrals calculated from atomic orbitals, however, would lead to a large overestimation of the true e-e interaction, since in solids the Coulomb interaction is screened (especially [math]\displaystyle{ F^0 }[/math]).
- In practice these integrals are therefore often treated as parameters, i.e., adjusted to reach agreement with experiment in some sense: equilibrium volume, magnetic moment, band gap, structure. They are normally specified in terms of the effective on-site Coulomb- and exchange parameters, U and J (LDAUU and LDAUJ, respectively). U and J are sometimes extracted from constrained-LSDA calculations.
- These translate into values for the Slater integrals in the following way (as implemented in VASP at the moment):
[math]\displaystyle{ L\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ F^0\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ F^2\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ F^4\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ F^6\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ 1\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ U\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ 5J\; }[/math] - - [math]\displaystyle{ 2\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ U\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{14}{1+0.625}J }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ 0.625 F^2\; }[/math] - [math]\displaystyle{ 3\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ U\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{6435}{286+195 \cdot 0.668+250 \cdot 0.494}J }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ 0.668 F^2\; }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ 0.494 F^2\; }[/math]
- The essence of the DFT+U method consists of the assumption that one may now write the total energy as:
- [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm{tot}}(n,\hat n)=E_{\mathrm{DFT}}(n)+E_{\mathrm{HF}}(\hat n)-E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n) }[/math]
- where the Hartree-Fock like interaction replaces the LSDA on site due to the fact that one subtracts a double counting energy [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm{dc}} }[/math], which supposedly equals the on-site LSDA contribution to the total energy,
- [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n) = \frac{U}{2} {\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}-1) - \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). }[/math]
- LDAUTYPE=2: The simplified (rotationally invariant) approach to the DFT+U, introduced by Dudarev et al.[4]
- This flavour of DFT+U is of the following form:
- [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm{DFT+U}}=E_{\mathrm{LSDA}}+\frac{(U-J)}{2}\sum_\sigma \left[ \left(\sum_{m_1} n_{m_1,m_1}^{\sigma}\right) - \left(\sum_{m_1,m_2} \hat n_{m_1,m_2}^{\sigma} \hat n_{m_2,m_1}^{\sigma} \right) \right]. }[/math]
- This can be understood as adding a penalty functional to the LSDA total energy expression that forces the on-site occupancy matrix in the direction of idempotency,
- [math]\displaystyle{ \hat n^{\sigma} = \hat n^{\sigma} \hat n^{\sigma} }[/math].
- Real matrices are only idempotent when their eigenvalues are either 1 or 0, which for an occupancy matrix translates to either fully occupied or fully unoccupied levels.
- Note: in Dudarev's approach the parameters U and J do not enter seperately, only the difference (U-J) is meaningful.
- In the LDA+U case the double counting energy is given by,
- [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n) = \frac{U}{2} {\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}-1) - \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). }[/math]
Warning: it is important to be aware of the fact that when using the L(S)DA+U, in general the total energy will depend on the parameters U and J (LDAUU and LDAUJ, respectively). It is therefore not meaningful to compare the total energies resulting from calculations with different U and/or J, or U-J in case of Dudarev's approach (LDAUTYPE=2).
Note on bandstructure calculation: the CHGCAR file contains only information up to angular momentum quantum number L=LMAXMIX for the on-site PAW occupancy matrices. When the CHGCAR file is read and kept fixed in the course of the calculations (ICHARG=11), the results will be necessarily not identical to a selfconsistent run. The deviations are often large for L(S)DA+U calculations. For the calculation of band structures within the L(S)DA+U approach, it is hence strictly required to increase LMAXMIX to 4 (d elements) and 6 (f elements).
Related Tags and Sections
LDAU, LDAUL, LDAUU, LDAUJ, LDAUPRINT, LMAXMIX
References
- ↑ A. Rohrbach, J. Hafner, and G. Kresse J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 979 (2003).
- ↑ O. Bengone, M. Alouani, P. Blöchl, and J. Hugel, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16392 (2000).
- ↑ A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaane, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467 (1995).
- ↑ S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).