positive total energy

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
IBRAHIM
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:00 pm
License Nr.: 5-2551

positive total energy

#1 Post by IBRAHIM » Thu Oct 16, 2025 9:26 am

Dear All,

I obtained a positive total energy when using the Ag-sv-GW POTCAR for Ag system; however, this was not the case with the Ag-PBE and Ag-GW POTCARs.

Could you please check why this happened?

Many thanks in advance,
Ibrahim

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

martin.schlipf
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:18 am

Re: positive total energy

#2 Post by martin.schlipf » Fri Oct 17, 2025 9:37 am

I can confirm that the positive total energy exists. It is a bit larger than I would expect to see for these systems. However, absolute energies are meaningless with a pseudopotential method. The only important quantity are relative energies. To get these, I computed the bare atom by just removing the last three atoms from your structure. It turns out that this energy is also positive for the problematic POTCAR.

Code: Select all

POTCAR           energy-atom   energy-cluster   4*atom-cluster
--------------------------------------------------------------
PAW_PBE Ag       -0.03877022      -5.43378560       5.27870471
PAW_PBE Ag_GW    -0.03846161      -5.44581400       5.29196758
PAW_PBE Ag_sv_GW  2.02465203       2.80553583       5.29307220

So the energy differences are fine. The softer PAW has a bit larger difference but the two GW potentials yield more or less the same energy.

Btw, if you set all MAGMOM to 0 it is better to calculate with ISPIN=1. This leads to faster calculations and faster convergence.

Martin Schlipf
VASP developer


Post Reply