Issue with Improved Dimer Method on Transition State at More Negative Potentials (VASPsol++)

To share experience including discussions about scientific questions.


Moderators: Moderator, Global Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
shweta_mehta1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2024 8:02 am

Issue with Improved Dimer Method on Transition State at More Negative Potentials (VASPsol++)

#1 Post by shweta_mehta1 » Thu Feb 05, 2026 2:26 pm

We are modeling the transition state (TS) for CO₂ hydrogenation on a solid-state catalyst using a cluster with explicit solvent including an H₃O⁺ ion, under different applied potentials via VASPsol++. Our workflow was as follows:

1. Optimized initial and final states at −0.5 V vs SHE.
2. Performed a CI-NEB calculation at −0.5 V vs SHE.
3. Carried out a frequency calculation on the highest energy image, which showed an imaginary frequency corresponding to the reaction coordinate.
4. Used the Improved Dimer Method (IDM), which converged to a TS with one imaginary frequency along the reaction path.

Next, we attempted to take this optimized TS to a more negative potential. Frequency calculations still showed an imaginary frequency along the reaction path, but when we used this as a starting point for IDM, the structure “exploded” during the optimization.

Here is the INCAR we used for IDM:

ISTART = 0
ICHARG = 1
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.2
EDIFF = 1E-06 # Tried 1E-08, same result
EDIFFG = -0.05
ALGO = Fast
NSW = 1000
IBRION = 44
POTIM = 0.05 # Tried 0.01, still exploded
ISYM = 0
LREAL = Auto # Tried LREAL = FALSE, still exploded
IVDW = 11
LSOL = .TRUE.
ISOL = 2
C_MOLAR = 1.0
R_ION = 4
EFERMI_ref = -3.57

Any advice or insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.


andreas.singraber
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2021 7:40 am

Re: Issue with Improved Dimer Method on Transition State at More Negative Potentials (VASPsol++)

#2 Post by andreas.singraber » Wed Feb 11, 2026 10:02 am

Hello!

I will move your post to the "From users for users" board because your questions target at a very specialized workflow which also involves third-party software and modifications to VASP. I have no experience in the procedures you are describing, therefore I am not able to contribute here. However, maybe other users could help if you provide them with some more information, in particular the input files you used when running the improved dimer method and observed the structure "exploding".

All the best,
Andreas Singraber


longfei_guo1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2026 4:44 am

Re: Issue with Improved Dimer Method on Transition State at More Negative Potentials (VASPsol++)

#3 Post by longfei_guo1 » Mon Mar 30, 2026 2:21 am

Hi,

Could you upload the structures? I am calculating the same models of CO2RR.

Best
Longfei


rwindiks
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:55 am
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Issue with Improved Dimer Method on Transition State at More Negative Potentials (VASPsol++)

#4 Post by rwindiks » Tue Jul 21, 2026 7:23 am

Hi,

to exclude that the reported issue due to VASPsol++, you might want to do the following:
1. From the failed calculation with VASPsol++ and the more negative potential extract the number of electrons used (defined by the directive NELECT)
2. Repeat the failed calculation but with setting LSOL = .FALSE. and using NELECT to the value used in the previous step

You might want to freeze all atoms that are not involved in the reaction and rearrangement.

Make sure that in all steps of the Dimer method the energy is converged to a negative value. Otherwise the calculated forces used in the Dimer method are rubbish. Use ALGO = All with a timestep of 0.2 and increase the number of SCF iterations to 300 or even 400 steps. Accurate forces are essential for the Dimer method!

Thanks.

René


Post Reply