Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
patrizio_graziosi
- Newbie

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:00 pm
#1
Post
by patrizio_graziosi » Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:36 am
Hello everybody,
I have started to run calculations on a structure given to me by experimental colleagues. During the convergence tests I find in the OUTCAR file what follows:
eigenvalues EBANDS = ******************
atomic energy EATOM = 32269.71645653
Solvation Ediel_sol = 0.00000000
---------------------------------------------------
free energy TOTEN = ****************** eV
energy without entropy =****************** energy(sigma->0) =******************
Would you mind to help in understanding that meaning? ...I have never seen it...
Thanks
Patrizio
-
michael_wolloch
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:17 am
#2
Post
by michael_wolloch » Fri Oct 24, 2025 10:25 am
Dear Patrizio Graziosi,
This output is created if the number has too many digits to fit in the output field for the write statement.
Please attach your input and output files, according to the posting guidelines, so I can analyze what goes wrong and if we need to fix this issue.
Thanks, Michael
-
patrizio_graziosi
- Newbie

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:00 pm
#3
Post
by patrizio_graziosi » Fri Oct 24, 2025 2:05 pm
Dear Michael,
thanks for the fast reply. I attach the INCAR and OUTCAR files for two k-grids, 2 2 2 and 3 3 3, together with the POSCAR; the message appears only in the first case.
Thanks,
Patrizio
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
michael_wolloch
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:17 am
#4
Post
by michael_wolloch » Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:34 pm
Dear Patrizio,
Thanks for the files. It looks like the calculation with the lower k-point mesh diverged after around 12 electronic steps.
Here are the free energies (TOTEN) for both runs from step 10 to step 15:
Code: Select all
2x2x2 3x3x3
-1983.81941312 -1975.89172162
-1872.02127735 -1801.08461317
-1780.33849634 -1573.03982291
-2625.77392198 -1166.65860979
-4667.88520473 -1042.59180719
-34279912.71741207 -1003.08212304
Soon after, the energies are too large to fit into the output field. And the 2x2x2 calculation never converges. I will do some tests to check what goes wrong. Here are a few initial thoughts:
-
For this system, which I would call a molecule in a box, you should do the simulation with the gamma point only.
-
The vacuum space in the x and y directions seems small, especially with vdW forces enabled. You will get lots of interactions between the replicas.
-
ALGO=All should be more robust if you keep having convergence troubles.
-
Electrostatic corrections might play a role.
I hope this helps,
Michael
-
michael_wolloch
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:17 am
#5
Post
by michael_wolloch » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:10 pm
Hi Patrizio,
I have converged your system (initially without vdW interactions) without much trouble using
Otherwise, I copied your settings (other than parallelization) and made a \(\Gamma\)-point only calculation, using the appropriate version of VASP. It takes a while ( around 150 steps), but the system converges well.
I then started from a WAVECAR using DFT-D3 corrections, and convergence was achieved in a few steps.
Let me know if you have success with this as well, and if I can lock the topic.
Cheers, Michael
-
patrizio_graziosi
- Newbie

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:00 pm
#6
Post
by patrizio_graziosi » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:53 pm
Hello Michael,
so with these input tags you could converge the system with a k-points mesh not restricted to Gamma-only? If so, I will try these information.
In the meantime, I am also trying to understand a realistic periodicity together with my experimental colleagues because the system must be a 3D crystal, not a single-molecule...
Patrizio
-
michael_wolloch
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:17 am
#7
Post
by michael_wolloch » Thu Nov 27, 2025 9:33 am
Hi Patrizio,
I am just checking in to see if you still have any questions on this topic? Did you succeed with a tighter mesh and a periodic structure?
If there are no more issues, please let me know so I can lock the topic.
Cheers, Michael