Supercells

Questions will be moved to this forum when we consider them out of scope for support from our side: for instance when we do not have the necessary expertise to come up with an answer.
Another user still might, though!

Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
weronika_walkosz3
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 2:45 pm

Supercells

#1 Post by weronika_walkosz3 » Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:45 pm

Hello,
When working with supercells to model surfaces with adsorbates attached to one side only, the positions of the atoms in the bottom layers are often fixed with Selective Dynamics. Should these positions correspond to the bulk coordinates, or should they correspond to the relaxed coordinates obtained in a calculation without adsorbates?
Thank you.

fabien_tran1
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:02 am

Re: Supercells

#2 Post by fabien_tran1 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:07 am

Hi,

If you need to compare the total energies obtained with the two calculations (one with adsorbates and the other without), then you have to be consistent and make the same choice for both calculations (choose the bulk positions or relax the positions).

If you don't really need the calculation without adsorbates, then which positions to use is more a question of taste. In this respect, what is usually done in studies published in the literature?

alex
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
License Nr.: 5-67
Location: Germany

Re: Supercells

#3 Post by alex » Tue Jun 28, 2022 1:11 pm

Hi Veronika,

I normally relaxed all atoms for the bare slab, fixed one side later and took the other one for the adsorbate.
You'll gain minimum forces at the fixed/not-fixed interface in the slab, which is good for a later frequency analysis (less imaginary modes).

Best regards,

alex

weronika_walkosz3
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 2:45 pm

Re: Supercells

#4 Post by weronika_walkosz3 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:15 pm

Thank you all.

Post Reply